[WRTC2006] WRTC2010 TL Selection Critiera - Addl. Questions

Randy Thompson k5zd em charter.net
Sexta Agosto 3 10:02:43 BRT 2007


EUHF is sponsored by Slovenia Contest Club.

Past leader of WRTC (and therefore very influential guy) is S50A.

I don't know if this is the reason, but anyone who runs a WRTC deserves to
be heard. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: wrtc2006-bounces em wrtc2006.com 
> [mailto:wrtc2006-bounces em wrtc2006.com] On Behalf Of Tonno Vahk
> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 10:23 AM
> To: 'WRTC2006 List'
> Subject: Re: [WRTC2006] WRTC2010 TL Selection Critiera - 
> Addl. Questions
> 
> Hi,
> 
> my comment would be that it is strange the EU HF enjoys so 
> high position compared to WPX and IARU, etc. Still 
> participation is quite limited in EU HF and as EU is divided 
> into so many areas it is really simple to get very high 
> points compared to the competition and difficulty of 36 hours 
> efforts in WPX, etc... Shouldn't it be at least equal to WPX? 
> Also, top scores are usually quite similar in such short 
> contest as EUHF, that means many people will get very high 
> points. Just for example if we look at 2006 results the top 
> ten in MIXED HP looks like:
> 
> RA1AIP        1597  1565   324  1533  2.00%  496692
> UW2M          1475  1462   308  1451  0.88%  446908
> RK3AWL        1467  1440   314  1413  1.84%  443682
> UU7J          1503  1448   313  1393  3.66%  436009
> UW5Q          1349  1325   318  1301  1.78%  413718
> LY5R          1328  1307   313  1286  1.58%  402518
> LY4AA         1366  1355   297  1344  0.81%  399168
> LY6M          1340  1324   298  1308  1.19%  389784
> LY9Y          1296  1270   302  1244  2.01%  375688
> RW1ZA         1259  1249   289  1239  0.79%  358071
> 
> That means in EU3 (my area) all the LY stations get 793-850 
> points easily which is way more than anybody can get in any 
> other contest than CQWW and RDXC. Even YL2GD who is 14th (!!) 
> will get as many points as the winner of WPX in EU3!! That 
> does not make sense. Furthermore, participation from EU areas 
> 1 and 2 is much smaller in EU HF. Maximum points (850) in 
> those areas go to F5VIH and OL5Y for 20th and 22nd place overall!!
> 
> Really, the winning scores are too similar and participation 
> too small to grant so high points to EUHF.
> 
> Otherwise everything looks locigal and great job done by 
> Harry and others!
> 
> One more thing to emphasize is really importance of checking 
> cheating. Now suddenly there is something else in addition to 
> just winning contest to gain
> - WRTC spot, and my guess is we will see average multiplier 
> figures of SOAB non-assisted stations going up in big 
> contests. I really hope the WRTC organizers having the 
> experience and means will urge and help organizers of CQWW, 
> WPX and IARU to expose those guys...
> 
> gl es 73
> tonno
> es5tv
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wrtc2006-bounces em wrtc2006.com 
> [mailto:wrtc2006-bounces em wrtc2006.com]
> On Behalf Of Alex Tkatch
> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 10:45 AM
> To: Igor Booklan SRR
> Cc: wrtc2006 em wrtc2006.com
> Subject: Re: [WRTC2006] WRTC2010 TL Selection Critiera - 
> Addl. Questions
> 
> Harry,
> Could you please change around points per contests
> for: 
>  
> CQWW (CW&SSB)                      950
> RDXC                               910
> EU HF                              850
> WPX (CW&SSB)                       780
> IARU                               760
> WAE (CW&SSB)                       750
> ARRL (CW&SSB)                      720
> SS (CW&SSB)                        600
> NA Sprint (CW&SSB)                 520
> 
> I think giving some advantage to RDXC is fair in this table, 
> but NA Sprint may be eliminated without too much pain to 
> everyone(or state the reason why it's even there) 
> 
>  Having NA Sprint and SS higher that it list here doesn't 
> make too much sense. Could you propose more competitive test 
> than NA Sprint to be there to begin with?
>  Judge selection different from the 'normal lottery'
> looks a bit suspicious. I don't think we had an issue there 
> at PY WRTC or earlier, so can you please back off from 
> changing the rule on judges to 2006 or similar?
> Thanks, Alex KU1CW
>   
> --- Igor Booklan SRR <ra3auu em srr.ru> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Scott
> > 
> > I exactly know what you are talking about.
> > 
> > I have my personal example with putting up a lot of efforts for the 
> > Cyprus M/S contest station. The reason of doing this is not 
> just WRTC.
> > We are having fun there winning (or not winning) DX 
> contests, relaxing 
> > from Moscow megapolis rush etc, but it doesn't mean we 
> should create 
> > rules for those like me.
> > 
> > We, the DX QTH guys, have big scores due to a good DX locations but 
> > why should the others get out of this process ? So, the 
> rules we have 
> > are supporting and respecting those from HOME AREA !!
> > 
> > As I was saying earlier we would love to see all of you guys among 
> > competitors. And at the same time I am 100 per cent sure 
> that we would 
> > not be able to make everyone happy with the rules.
> > 
> > There are few mistekes we did like the one with Sprint, which we 
> > clarify shortly but please accept the rules as they are !!!
> > 
> > 73s, Harry RA3AUU
> > 
> > 
> > SR> --- Igor Booklan SRR <ra3auu em srr.ru> wrote:
> > 
> > >> Hi Tom!
> > >> 
> > >> I understand your point but have a look from a
> > different point of view
> > >> .. from your countrymen point of view.
> > >> 
> > >> I also feel very comfortable operation from
> > Cyprus "beating" my
> > >> Russian friends and I don't have 2nd station. But
> > when I looked from
> > >> their point I was giving them no chance at all,
> > so I changed my mind
> > >> and I respect them very much.
> > >> 
> > >> Now I will have to find a solution to compete
> > from Russia as well!
> > >> 
> > >> 73s, Harry RA3AUU
> > 
> > SR> you also wrote:
> > >> 
> > >> GT> I don't see any problems with someone winning
> > 4 contests from REMOTE
> > >> GT> AREA. You would still have to be good enough
> > to win another 4 from
> > >> GT> your HOME AREA.
> > 
> > SR> You're missing the point.  There is a tremendous
> > amount of work that goes into
> > SR> maintaining ONE contest station whether it's
> > where you live or even more so in
> > SR> a foreign country.  You have to be HIGHLY
> > motivated to set up, maintain, travel
> > SR> to, use a DX QTH station time and time again and
> > dare I say there are few that
> > SR> would put themselves through that who are
> > sub-par contest ops.  And now they
> > SR> have to have a competitive station at home, too,
> > or manage to beg or borrow
> > SR> someone else's QTH for DX contests?  And have to
> > purposefully stay away from
> > SR> their DX QTH if they want to attempt to qualify
> > for WRTC-2010?  
> > 
> > SR> You're going to cut off guys like CT1BOH, W2GD,
> > W2SC who are some of the best
> > SR> and most motivated ops in the world merely
> > because they don't have two
> > SR> competitive contest stations to operate from in
> > two different countries.  That
> > SR> doesn't sound right to me. 
> > 
> > SR> 73
> > SR> Scott Robbins, W4PA
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > WRTC2006 mailing list
> > WRTC2006 em wrtc2006.com
> > http://list.wrtc2006.com/mailman/listinfo/wrtc2006
> > 
> 
> 
> 
>        
> ______________________________________________________________
> ______________
> ________
> Sick sense of humor? Visit Yahoo! TV's
> Comedy with an Edge to see what's on, when. 
> http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/222
> _______________________________________________
> WRTC2006 mailing list
> WRTC2006 em wrtc2006.com
> http://list.wrtc2006.com/mailman/listinfo/wrtc2006
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WRTC2006 mailing list
> WRTC2006 em wrtc2006.com
> http://list.wrtc2006.com/mailman/listinfo/wrtc2006
> 




Mais detalhes sobre a lista de discussão WRTC2006