[WRTC2006] referees

Mon Aug 6 23:12:50 BRT 2007

I told something on the same way
a week ago. Less RIG and more
OP. But this just me, and will be a
great WRTC anyway. Some of us
did a great job at WRTC2006 without
second radio (burned), network
computer, etc - other problems!
Now, the problem will be $$ to
extra baggage hi hi... And filters,
and duplexers, and lockout box,
and FT2000/9000/IC7800/
Hilberling...
Will be a great challenge, but I still
have my FT-857D hi hi ...
See you all next weeked from PS2T...
Vitor, PY2NY

 At least, will not be
necessary to buy or have the
amplifier...
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Randy Thompson" <k5zd at charter.net>
To: "'WRTC2006 List'" <wrtc2006 at wrtc2006.com>; "'Igor Booklan SRR'" 
<ra3auu at srr.ru>
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 11:02 PM
Subject: Re: [WRTC2006] referees

> This is one of my biggest concerns about the direction of WRTC.  In the
> beginning, it was one radio with two operators working very closely
> together.  Team was more important than $$$ invested in station.
>
> In Brazil, we added the second station and we see things like YT6A super
> engineering of filters and duplexers.  Wow.
>
> For Russia, we will need a full multi-two station (or more!) with a
> transmitter lockout. I can't imagine how many $$ YT6A will spend this 
> time,
> or how many boxes each team will be required to bring.
>
> Reminds me of Formula 1.  The teams with the most $$ have the fastest 
> cars.
> They still need good drivers to win, but it is very difficult for all of 
> the
> other teams no mattter who is driving!
>
> I am still impressed by the showing from the 9A team in Brazil.  22Kg 
> total
> weight of bags due to airline restriction -- including their clothes!  I
> want to see WRTC reward operating over $$$.
>
> This is just my opinion.  I am not asking for the rules to change.  Only 
> for
> us to think about the purpose and goals of WRTC in the future.
>
> Randy, K5ZD
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: wrtc2006-bounces at wrtc2006.com
>> [mailto:wrtc2006-bounces at wrtc2006.com] On Behalf Of Marijan
>> Miletic', S56A
>> Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2007 9:37 PM
>> To: Igor Booklan SRR; WRTC2006 List
>> Subject: Re: [WRTC2006] referees
>>
>> I am not sure that you might find any referee which can
>> handle 4 audio channels in real time as your propossed rules
>> enable both operators using SO2R techniques!
>>
>> I wonder who would provide transceivers interlocking
>> circuits?  Only YT1NT made significant technology
>> contribution to the whole WRTC history.
>>
>> 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Igor Booklan SRR" <ra3auu at srr.ru>
>> To: "Randy Thompson" <k5zd at charter.net>
>> Cc: "'WRTC2006 List'" <wrtc2006 at wrtc2006.com>
>> Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2007 9:36 PM
>> Subject: Re: [WRTC2006] referees
>>
>>
>> > Randy,
>> >
>> > The only reason for this is contest rules.
>> >
>> > WRTC-2010 referee MUST have a very good contester skills,
>> not average
>> > skills, but 24-hour fully SO2R contest skills. We strongly believe
>> > that TL has much more knowledge of such contesters who can handle
>> > SO2R and much better than WRTC and WRTC SC committee.
>> >
>> > Randy, let's leave this referee subject for a while. We are talking
>> > Fall 2009 selection time, so we'll discuss it further.
>> >
>> > 73s, Harry RA3AUU
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > RT> My question was why?  Why involve the TLs in this
>> process?  What
>> > problem are
>> > RT> you trying to solve?
>> >
>> > RT> There are many good contesters out there who know they will not
>> > qualify for
>> > RT> WRTC, but would like to be involved.  In the past, they
>> would apply
>> > and the
>> > RT> organizer would make a selection.  I never heard any
>> complaints about
>> > this.
>> >
>> > RT> Now they have to make friends with a TL (who will they
>> be? Better make
>> > RT> friends with many of them.)  This also puts the TL in a
>> difficult
>> > position.
>> > RT> They already have to make a difficult choice of who to
>> invite as their
>> > RT> partner.  Now they will also have to select a referee.
>> If I was a PL,
>> > I
>> > RT> know I would prefer to avoid this extra layer of politics.  The
>> > committee
>> > RT> can do all of this selection in secret and it has been
>> well accepted
>> > in the
>> > RT> past.
>> >
>> > RT> Randy, K5ZD
>> > RT>
>> >
>> >>> -----Original Message-----
>> >>> From: wrtc2006-bounces at wrtc2006.com
>> >>> [mailto:wrtc2006-bounces at wrtc2006.com] On Behalf Of Igor
>> Booklan SRR
>> >>> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 9:26 PM
>> >>> To: wrtc2006 at wrtc2006.com
>> >>> Subject: [WRTC2006] referees
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi guys!
>> >>>
>> >>> I again would like to come back to referees question.
>> >>>
>> >>> We discussed this question over and this is the solution:
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. A Team Leader nominates a Referee.
>> >>> A Team Leader should submit his nominated referee Contesting
>> >>> curriculum vitae to prove referee's contesting skills in
>> both modes.
>> >>> WRTC-2010 committee has right to change any referee nominated
>> >>> by TL to the more expirienced one if they see not enough
>> >>> qualification of nominated referee.
>> >>>
>> >>> 2. Back-up referees list.
>> >>> WRTC-2010 committee will have to have a back-up referees
>> >>> list, since every WRTC several of referees have to cancel
>> their trip.
>> >>>
>> >>> Anyone wishing to be a WRTC-2010 referee can apply their
>> >>> calls to both lists offering themselves to Team Leaders and
>> >>> to WRTC-2010 committee.
>> >>>
>> >>> 73s, Harry RA3AUU
>> >>>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > WRTC2006 mailing list
>> > WRTC2006 at wrtc2006.com
>> > http://list.wrtc2006.com/mailman/listinfo/wrtc2006
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> WRTC2006 mailing list
>> WRTC2006 at wrtc2006.com
>> http://list.wrtc2006.com/mailman/listinfo/wrtc2006
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WRTC2006 mailing list
> WRTC2006 at wrtc2006.com
> http://list.wrtc2006.com/mailman/listinfo/wrtc2006
>
> E-mail classificado pelo Identificador de Spam Inteligente Terra.
> Para alterar a categoria classificada, visite
> http://mail.terra.com.br/cgi-bin/imail.cgi?+_u=py2ny&_l=1,1186452183.314680.9769.aldabra.terra.com.br,8377,Des15,Des15
>
> Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra.
> Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 06/08/2007 / Versão: 
> 5.1.00/5091
> Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/
> 