[WRTC2006] WRTC2010 TL Selection Critiera - Addl. Questions

Alexander Avramov lz4ax at psu.edu
Fri Jul 27 23:50:31 BRT 2007


Rich,

if you go back to the rules and re-read them it would stop sound so 
reasonable. You are competing not against John's scores from P40W but 
against the points he earned after his score was normalized to the best 
score from that area - SA or Caribbean. Your score gets normalized to 
K5ZD's score :) And then you compare the points. As far as I see it, 
this procedure doesn't give John any advantage over you. Well, unless 
you think that down there the competition isn't that tough as it is here :)

73, Alex LZ4AX

Richard DiDonna NN3W wrote:
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: John Crovelli
>> To: ra3auu at srr.ru ; wrtc2006 at wrtc2006.com
>> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 8:37 PM
>> Subject: Re: [WRTC2006] WRTC2010 TL Selection Critiera - Addl. Questions
>>
>>
>> Hi Harry,
>> Thank you for your quick response to my quesiton.  I am naturally 
>> disappointed to see a  rule that limits consideration to only 4 DX contest 
>> scores since nearly >100% of my own DX contest entries occur from a DX 
>> location and not my home country, so in effect I and others in a similiar 
>> situation are penalized for our off ?>shore efforts.
>>     
>
> Honestly, it sounds reasonable to me.  Why should I, in the eastern USA, be 
> competing against scores posted by somebody from a different part of the 
> world?  Theoretically, I could run off to some random place in the Pacific 
> for 8 contests, run up a decent score, and then come back and claim them as 
> top scores for the east coast.  Does that seem to be a reasonable action for 
> those hams who choose to stay at home in their relevant geographic area and 
> compete at home?
>
>
>   


More information about the WRTC2006 mailing list