[WRTC2006] WRTC2010

[ku8e]

Fabio,

I think you misunderstood my comment. I only asked that GA,SC and FL be 
included in region #2 in NA. I didn't ask for another region for NA. Region 
#1 will be the most competitive by far since W1/W2/W3 historically win all 
the DX contests for the USA.

Jeff




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "HRS I4UFH" <i4ufh at hamradiosolutions.com>
To: <wrtc2006 at wrtc2006.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: [WRTC2006] WRTC2010


> Hi Harry,
>
>> As I was answering Jeff KU8E, the situation can get to a noncense with
> splitting continents to more and more > ares. Since none of us would ever 
>  >
> do a correct selection let's live with what we offer.
>
> I still don't agree with you decision, be in the WRTC commitee is an hard
> work and you are doing an excellent one, at least learning from previous
> WRTC and leave an opened door for any suggestion is one the improvement 
> that
> from the Brazilian event we, as reflector user, was
> accustomed
>
> Obviously is a my opinion and as usual can be shared from the Country in 
> the
> borders of the areas ... We will live with it ...
>
> HI> SO single Band, well some time there no chance to be setted on a
> HI> All Band, most of the time , wheather issue, work issue, operator
> HI> issue, same shared QTH for 2 SOSB, you cannot have the station
> HI> setted for a All Band, and Single Band is the only choice to be
> HI> competitive. Can i suggest a Category Factor for the SOSB ??
>
>>We are talking about the strongest contesters possible. You can chose
> strongest contesters from MAXIMUM categories, which are definitely not 
> Sinle
> Band ones.
>
> Well, what you really mean "strongest contesters possible", so you mean 
> that
> only who move mults into a SO2R envioriment is eligible ?  Well if you 
> mean
> that a SOSB is not difficult as a All Band ? I can partially agree but
> adding a 0.5 SOSB factor insure you to have the best op even giving a 
> chance
> to the SOSB guys ..
>
> As usual we will live with what you offer.
>
> Above Rules I can agree ........
>
>
> HI> Referees : Selected from Team Leader ? Is there the right choice
> HI> ? The scope of the Judge/Referre is to be an experenced observer
> HI> and to have the capability to judge,and follow the Team, is the
> HI> selection is made from the TL, that could be some Judge selection
> HI> that cannot supply that kind of standard needed to be one of them.
>
>
>>We are confident that the WRTC judge should be as strong and professional
> as competitors themselves or even better. The judge is 24
>>hours SO2R while competitors don't need to do SO2R, so it should be a very
> very qualified judge !! Who else but the Team Leader knows the
>>best judge he can trust to ???
>
>
> About Judge i still don't agree regarding the TL selections, in each
> competitions the judges are selected and assigned from the commitee,
> previous WRTC has a perfect rules, why change them ? We will see a whole 
> of
> friendly assigments that could not have the right qualify for a judge ...
> ( i trust in each TL but friends are friends ... )  Obviously only a
> personal opinion.
>
> We had seen several friendly activity in the early WRTC's
>
> As usual we will live with what you offer.
>
>>There is no other choice but open discussion, so questions are welcome.
>
> Thank's to care about our comments/suggestion ......
>
>>Just don't forget that I don't have all the answer.
>
> I know ..... :)
>
> 73s, Harry RA3AUU
>
> 73 de I4UFH
> _______________________________________________
> WRTC2006 mailing list
> WRTC2006 at wrtc2006.com
> http://list.wrtc2006.com/mailman/listinfo/wrtc2006