[WRTC2006] WRTC2010

[HRS I4UFH]

Hi, Jeff,

well thank's for you comments, I had more clear view now, I just agree with
Mario that a better referres selection could be a right step .....

73 I4UFH


----- Original Message -----
From: "ku8e" <ku8e at bellsouth.net>
To: <wrtc2006 at wrtc2006.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 11:54 PM
Subject: Re: [WRTC2006] WRTC2010


> Fabio,
>
> I think you misunderstood my comment. I only asked that GA,SC and FL be
> included in region #2 in NA. I didn't ask for another region for NA.
Region
> #1 will be the most competitive by far since W1/W2/W3 historically win all
> the DX contests for the USA.
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "HRS I4UFH" <i4ufh at hamradiosolutions.com>
> To: <wrtc2006 at wrtc2006.com>
> Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 3:08 PM
> Subject: Re: [WRTC2006] WRTC2010
>
>
> > Hi Harry,
> >
> >> As I was answering Jeff KU8E, the situation can get to a noncense with
> > splitting continents to more and more > ares. Since none of us would
ever
> >  >
> > do a correct selection let's live with what we offer.
> >
> > I still don't agree with you decision, be in the WRTC commitee is an
hard
> > work and you are doing an excellent one, at least learning from previous
> > WRTC and leave an opened door for any suggestion is one the improvement
> > that
> > from the Brazilian event we, as reflector user, was
> > accustomed
> >
> > Obviously is a my opinion and as usual can be shared from the Country in
> > the
> > borders of the areas ... We will live with it ...
> >
> > HI> SO single Band, well some time there no chance to be setted on a
> > HI> All Band, most of the time , wheather issue, work issue, operator
> > HI> issue, same shared QTH for 2 SOSB, you cannot have the station
> > HI> setted for a All Band, and Single Band is the only choice to be
> > HI> competitive. Can i suggest a Category Factor for the SOSB ??
> >
> >>We are talking about the strongest contesters possible. You can chose
> > strongest contesters from MAXIMUM categories, which are definitely not
> > Sinle
> > Band ones.
> >
> > Well, what you really mean "strongest contesters possible", so you mean
> > that
> > only who move mults into a SO2R envioriment is eligible ?  Well if you
> > mean
> > that a SOSB is not difficult as a All Band ? I can partially agree but
> > adding a 0.5 SOSB factor insure you to have the best op even giving a
> > chance
> > to the SOSB guys ..
> >
> > As usual we will live with what you offer.
> >
> > Above Rules I can agree ........
> >
> >
> > HI> Referees : Selected from Team Leader ? Is there the right choice
> > HI> ? The scope of the Judge/Referre is to be an experenced observer
> > HI> and to have the capability to judge,and follow the Team, is the
> > HI> selection is made from the TL, that could be some Judge selection
> > HI> that cannot supply that kind of standard needed to be one of them.
> >
> >
> >>We are confident that the WRTC judge should be as strong and
professional
> > as competitors themselves or even better. The judge is 24
> >>hours SO2R while competitors don't need to do SO2R, so it should be a
very
> > very qualified judge !! Who else but the Team Leader knows the
> >>best judge he can trust to ???
> >
> >
> > About Judge i still don't agree regarding the TL selections, in each
> > competitions the judges are selected and assigned from the commitee,
> > previous WRTC has a perfect rules, why change them ? We will see a whole
> > of
> > friendly assigments that could not have the right qualify for a judge
...
> > ( i trust in each TL but friends are friends ... )  Obviously only a
> > personal opinion.
> >
> > We had seen several friendly activity in the early WRTC's
> >
> > As usual we will live with what you offer.
> >
> >>There is no other choice but open discussion, so questions are welcome.
> >
> > Thank's to care about our comments/suggestion ......
> >
> >>Just don't forget that I don't have all the answer.
> >
> > I know ..... :)
> >
> > 73s, Harry RA3AUU
> >
> > 73 de I4UFH
> > _______________________________________________
> > WRTC2006 mailing list
> > WRTC2006 at wrtc2006.com
> > http://list.wrtc2006.com/mailman/listinfo/wrtc2006
>
> _______________________________________________
> WRTC2006 mailing list
> WRTC2006 at wrtc2006.com
> http://list.wrtc2006.com/mailman/listinfo/wrtc2006
>